|
Features
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Total
|
|
Title Slide
|
No title slide
|
Title slide is present, but lacks much of the required information
|
Title slide is present, but does not contain complete information
|
Title slide is present and contains:
Name(s) of pharaoh, dates of rule, dynasty number, cartouche, student name
|
|
|
Pictures
|
No pictures of pharaoh present
|
Only one picture of pharaoh or inaccurate pictures
|
Two pictures of pharaoh or inaccurate pictures
|
Three or more pictures of the pharaoh and are accurate pictures
|
|
|
Geographical Location and Influence
|
No description of location
|
Incomplete or inaccurate description of location
|
Adequate description of location including a few pictures or graphics of influence and/or capital city
|
Complete description of setting:
Includes documentation of capital city and other locations associated with the pharaoh and maps of influence during reign
|
|
|
Career Summary
|
Inaccurate summary or none present
|
Limited summary of pharaoh’s accomplishments detailing 1-2 events
|
Solid summary of pharaoh’s accomplishments detailing 3-4events
|
Solid summary of pharaoh’s accomplishments detailing 5 or more events
|
|
|
Outcomes
|
No description of outcomes
|
Inaccurate or incomplete description of outcome or limited information about death
|
Accurate description of most information of how the pharaoh died; some information about burial; little detailing burial
|
Complete, accurate description of how and why the pharaoh died and events surrounding his burial; information included about burial site and pictures of actual site or tomb
|
|
|
Originality
|
The work is a minimal plot summary. There is no evidence of new thought.
|
The work is merely a basic summary of he plot. There is no evidence of new thought, inventiveness, or insight.
|
The product shows some evidence of originality and inventiveness. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the content and extends beyond that to offer new insights and understanding of the pharaoh
|
The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and accurate reading comprehension.
|
|
|
Slide Design
|
Confusing, irrelevant, or distracting use of graphics, sound, and text.
Too few slides
|
Graphics and text are somewhat purposeful, but many are unrelated to content; too few slides
|
Graphics, sounds, and text are purposeful and most are logically related to content; too few or too many slides
|
Purposeful, logical flow of graphics, sound, and text to convey relevant content
|
|
|
Student Evaluation of Pharaoh
|
No evaluation
|
No justification for evaluation
|
Adequate justification for evaluation
|
Convincing, reasonable justification for evaluation, including a rating on 1-10 scale
|
|
|
Oral Presentation
|
No eye contact, voice too low to be heard, poor tone and style
|
Little eye contact, poor voice projection, tone, and style
|
Adequate eye contact, voice projection, tone, and style
|
Excellent eye contact, voice projection, pleasing tone, and engaging style
|
|
|
Works Cited
|
No sources cited or no works cited page present
|
A few sources cited; many incorrectly or not in required format
|
Most sources cited; basic format correct; some errors in required format
|
All sources cited accurately in required format.
|
|
|
Conventions
|
Too many mistakes: not readable
|
Punctuation, capitalization, and spelling errors; grammatical errors present
|
Few mistakes; further proofreading needed, but meaning is unimpaired
|
Good editing; correct mechanics; neat; no major errors, no more than two minor errors
|
|
