|
Category
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
X Factor
|
Total
|
|
Title Slide
|
More than one requirement was not completely met.
|
One requirement was not completely met.
|
All requirements are met, including title, author(s), date, and class..
|
All requirements are not only met but exceeded, including title, author(s), date, and class.
|
x1
|
|
|
Background
|
Not present few elements of background established
|
Some elements of background established thoroughly; may be missing details
|
Most elements of background established thoroughly, but missing some detail
|
All elements of background established thoroughly: Who? What? When? Where? Why?
|
x2
|
|
|
Personalities
|
Not present; most personalities missing
|
Some major personalities missing; little or no detail about them
|
Major personalities involved are introduced but may not be explained
|
Major personalities involved are introduced and explained thoroughly
|
x2
|
|
|
Detail of Mission, Biography, or Planet
|
Nothing mentioned
|
Little detail and description of mission, biography, or planet
|
Some detail and description of mission, biography, or planet
|
Excellent detail and description of mission, biography, or planet
|
x3
|
|
|
Events
|
Events leading up to the mission or discovery of the planet are not mentioned or explained
|
Events leading up to the mission or discovery of the planet are listed but not explained or documented
|
Events leading up to the mission or discovery of the planet are generally explained and documented
|
Events leading up to the mission or discovery of the planet are thoroughly explained and documented
|
x2
|
|
|
Timeline
|
Not present; no explanations anywhere else in the presentation
|
Timeline exists; events listed but not in detail; may not be detailed anywhere else in the presentation
|
Timeline with some explanation from the event or events associated with the mission, personality, or planet.
|
Expansive timeline with detailed explanation from the event or events associated with the mission, personality, or planet.
|
x3
|
|
|
Organization
|
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
|
Content is logically organized for the most part.
|
Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.
|
Content is well organized using headings and / or titled slides to group related material.
|
x1
|
|
|
Originality
|
Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.
|
Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.
|
Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.
|
Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.
|
x1
|
|
|
Relevance
|
Many slides and / or complete sections irrelevant to topic--they just don’t fit in.
|
Some slides and / or complete sections irrelevant to topic—may not fit in well here and there.
|
A few slides irrelevant to topic and may throw off the pace of the presentation.
|
All slides and sections relevant to topic. Everything fits in just right.
|
x1
|
|
|
Appearance
|
Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content.
|
Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.
|
Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.
|
Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
|
x2
|
|
|
Quality of Animations and Sounds
|
The sounds, and/or animations are unrelated to the content or distract from the content.
|
Some of the sounds, and/or animations seem unrelated to the topic/theme and do not enhance the overall concepts.
|
The sound/and or animation visually depict material and assist the audience in understanding the flow of information or content.
|
The sound and/or animation assist in presenting an overall theme and make visual connections that enhance understanding of concept, ideas and relationships.
|
x2
|
|
|
Presentation
|
Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost.
|
Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time.
|
Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time.
|
Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.
|
x2
|
|
|
Software Mastery
|
The student does not appear to know how to use the software without assistance; basic application of program.
|
Student knows how to use some parts of the software; slightly more than basic understanding of the functions of the program
|
Student knows how to use the software and demonstrates additional skills beyond basic understanding of the program; uses more than one piece of software
|
Student thoroughly understands the software and demonstrates an advanced understanding of its applications as shown in the presentation; uses multiple programs
|
x2
|
|
|
Time Management
|
Student was off-task the majority of the time during the project.
|
Student was off-task much of the time during the project, doing little work in the allotted time.
|
Student was off-task occasionally during the project, but worked steadily most of the time.
|
Student was engaged in the project and was on-task the majority of the time.
|
x2
|
|
|
Artistic Aspects
|
Student has produced a basic presentation with little consideration for artistic quality.
|
Student demonstrates some inclusion of artistic aspects in presentation
|
Student demonstrates overall consideration of artistic aspects in the construction of the presentation
|
Student thoroughly demonstrates artistic considerations in the presentation; much thought was put into its construction and appearance.
|
x2
|
|
|
Quality of Information Analysis
|
Information is merely copied from Internet sources; much is not relevant as applied to project—Plagiarized!!!
|
Information is copied to a great extent from Internet sources; some may not be relevant as applied to project—Plagiarism issues exist.
|
Information has been reworded from Internet sources; most is relevant as applied to project—little or no danger of plagiarism issues.
|
Information has been effectively reworded from Internet sources and is relevant and appropriate as applied to project—no danger of plagiarism issues. Well done!
|
x3
|
|
|
Mechanics
|
Multiple misspellings and/or grammatical errors or multiple instances of the same errors; extensive proofreading and reworking of material needed.
|
Four-six misspellings and/or grammatical errors or multiple instances of the same errors. Much more proofreading needed.
|
Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. Evidence of proofreading, but more attention to detail needed.
|
No misspellings or grammatical errors. Well proofread!
|
x2
|
|
|
Works Cited (as applied to information provided in PPT)
|
No works cited and/or no MLA format used
|
Too few sources, or sources of poor quality
Incorrectly cited
Incorrect MLA format
|
At least three quality sources are present; some incorrectly cited
Some errors in MLA format
|
More than three quality sources present
Correctly cited
Few or no errors in MLA format
|
x3
|
|
|
Word Document
|
Very little exists
|
Listing only of web addresses or blocks of information; little else present.
|
Some listing of research information including title and web address of information
|
Complete listing of research information including title and web address of information
|
x4
|
|
